A fleeting permission

I sometimes start an article by saying ‘back in blah blah, I wrote an article about…’, and this is one of those. The article in question is ‘Detecting with Shmee150’ and I’m referring to it because the article I’m about to write was born from the research that I did for that project.

During that research I came across an old aerial photograph taken in 1972, which showed the clear outline of a feature on the land below (Fig.1). It was unmistakably some kind of enclosure or building, and the irregular shape of it meant that it couldn’t possibly be modern. I sent the image to Gil Burleigh and Keith Fitzpatrick-Mathews to take a look at thinking that they would already be aware of it, and as it turns out they weren’t. For those who don’t already know, Gil is a retired archaeologist and was responsible for the excavation of the Dea Senuna (Ashwell) Hoard, which was a nationally significant discovery. Keith is still a working archaeologist and is the Curator and Heritage Access Officer at North Herts Museums. They both reacted quite excitedly, and the irregular shape suggested to them that the feature might be prehistoric. Luckily, Gil still lives in the local area and knows the land owners, so he contacted them with a view to gaining permission to conduct some field walking research. 

Shortly after revealing the aerial photo to Gil and Keith, Gil took a walk over to the field in question as it was only a short distance from where he lives. At that time the field was in crop so there was nothing to see, but Gil contacted the landowner outlining what had been found and what we would like to do. This would included some field walking exercises to be conducted by the North Hertfordshire Archaeological Society, and a metal detecting survey which would be my contribution. It wasn’t until late July that Gil came back with the following news… 

“Success! I was phoned yesterday evening by the landowner giving us permission for our archaeological survey including metal detecting. He’s not doing anything to the field for the next two months so that’s our window, and maybe a further brief opportunity after ploughing. James, I think you could detect there and plot any finds anytime during our window. If you get approached by anyone, tell them you have the landowners permission and are detecting on behalf of NHAS. I’m looking forward to doing the survey and seeing the results. Best wishes, Gil”.

This was music to my ears, a two month window on a new permission that had a definite archaeological feature in it, but, once again I had to curb my enthusiasm. Although Gil and Keith hadn’t known about this particular feature, they did know that there was a probable late Iron Age and Romano-British temple site nearby. This is because back in the early 1990’s some metal detectorists had found artefacts which related to there being to such a site. What the detectorists found didn’t show up when I did a search on the Portable Antiquities Scheme website, but then the PAS database wasn’t set up until 1997, so that might explain it. This did make me wonder if they had also detected where I was about to go, so this did subdue my excitement somewhat. But then Gil came back with the following message, which did give me a little bit of hope, “I know there was some metal detecting in that field in the mid-1990s, but I think further into the field and not where you are. No finds were reported to the museum”.

My first day on site revealed that this was going to be a difficult exercise (Fig.2). It was the beginning of August and we were in the middle of a very long, hot summer. We hadn’t seen rain for weeks so the ground was incredibly dry, dusty and hard. The initial three or four inches were quite crumbly due to the harvest, but anything below that was like rock. It didn’t look like rain was going to come anytime soon either, so I just had to make the best of it.

A few minutes after turning the detector on, my first target turned out to be a Roman coin (Fig.3a & 3b), a Radiate to be exact which would place it around the 3rd century AD. The coin was in pretty poor condition, which is not unusual for copper alloy coins from this period, but I considered it a great start. Although conditions were pretty tough on the digging front, this first session ended quite well. As you can see in Fig.4, I had a total of four Roman coins, a few modern buttons, a Charles I rose farthing, a huge lead steelyard weight (probably Roman) and a sherd of pottery that turned out to be late Iron Age. The pottery sherd was an eyes only surface find, as was the fossil which you can see in Fig.5.

The fossil is of an echinoid (sea urchin), which I was going to give to my son who is currently studying Marine Biology at university. But I was to soon change my mind when I showed the fossil to Gil and Keith. Gil said “Fossils are often found on historic sites because people of all periods liked to collect and curate them’. Keith then added “Ammonites are called that because in the Roman world they were associated with the rams’ horns of Jupiter Ammon. I can’t instantly think of an association with echinoids, but Gil’s absolutely right to highlight the significance of fossils”. Gil then followed up by saying “They are often found on ancient religious sites so your fossil find, James, should remain part of the site archive”. So there it was, what I believed to be a random fossil find, could actually be part of someone’s fossil collection from nearly 2000 years ago, you learn something new everyday!

And it didn’t stop there, Keith went on to say, “This is what Copilot says about fossil echinoids: Fossil echinoids were widely known as thunderstones, believed to fall from the sky during storms. In Celtic and Norse folklore, thunderstones were linked to protection from lightning, fertility, and resurrection myths”.

My next time out was the following weekend, and this was when I started to get my eye in for spotting pottery sherds lying around on the surface. You can see in Fig.6 where I kept a few pieces, but this was just scratching the surface. The more I looked, the more I saw, it was a bit like being able the see the image one of those magic eye posters in the early the 1990’s. Pottery sherds were literally everywhere, and the main concentrations were directly over where the feature was in the aerial photo. This session was a bit light on the metal finds front, but another Roman coin came up and part of a Roman brooch.

The brooch fragment seemed insignificant at first, but it was only when I got home and gave it a bit of a clean that I realised what it was. I then shared a picture of it with Keith and Gil, and within minutes Keith had messaged back. “It’s part of a Hod Hill brooch, it’s an early type, 40AD to shortly after 60AD. If you’ve got Mackreth’s book, it’s his number 9490 (Type 4.b.3)”. As it happens I did have Mackreth’s book, so I was able to see what the full brooch would have looked like (Fig.7). This was a brilliant find for dating purposes, which Gil echoed with his reply to Keith’s findings, “It looks like the site was occupied for at least all of the Roman period. Earlier and later? Purpose? That’s what we want to find out”.

It’s interesting to note that one of the pottery sherds that I picked up was part of a roman mortarium bowl (Fig.8). This is great evidence that people were actually living here, because mortariums were a staple part of Roman meal preparation. The interior walls and base of the mortarium were embedded with coarse stone or quartz grit to help grind and blend things like herbs and spices, and to make condiments such as garum. This sherd is lined with quartz grit which would likely place it in the earlier period of the Roman occupation of Britain.

The next outing on the site produced a few more Roman coins to add to the collection (Fig.9). One of these coins would turn out to be the highlight of my survey, which was a Nummus of Constantine (Figs.10a & 10b) and dates to around 330AD. Another interesting find from this bunch can be seen in closer detail in Figs.11a & 11b. The closest reference that I could find on the Portable Antiquities Scheme is that it maybe part of a handle from a Roman knife, razor or spatula. Gil wondered if it may have been part of a key handle, in any case, another good find from the Roman period. It would now be a while before I got out on to site again, but the next outing was going to be good for spotting pottery sherds again, due to a little bit of rain.

It soon became clear towards the end of the allotted time on this permission, that the field walking exercises weren’t going to take place. This was due to various reasons, but it ultimately meant that for this survey it would only be my time in the field that would be contributing to our understanding of what was going on here. This meant that on the next couple of outings I needed to pick up some more pottery sherds for dating purposes.

The archaeological feature that I was investigating was fairly close to a ditch which can be seen in Fig.12. So on the next session I decided to see if the finds extended in to the field on the other side. I had to ask for permission to do this, which was duly granted, and it brought up some interesting results. I had some more Roman coins come up, as you can see in Fig.13, and they were a lot bigger than any of the coins found so far. These coins are known as Sestertii, we know this due to their size and weight regardless of the terrible condition they are in. The Sestertius was the biggest coin used in Roman currency, and it was produced until the late 3rd century so it’s another good source for dating this site. 

But the best finds in my hand are the sherds of Roman samian ware pottery. This was the upper market pottery of Roman society, which is also another good reference to give us information about the status of the people who were living here. Even better is the fact that the sherd I found had the makers stamp on it (Fig.14), although I have yet to identify who the maker was. Weirdly I only found the samain pottery sherds on this side of the ditch and I have no idea why. After showing the images to Keith, he revealed “It’s stamped samian ware, made in Gaul during the first and second centuries”. He went on to add “It looks like a form Dr 27, a bi-lobed cup. Interestingly, the upper half has precisely twice the volume of the lower, and it’s been suggested that they may have been used for making and serving an oil and garum based dressing like a French dressing’. 

This ties in nicely with the mortarium sherd which I found (Fig.8), as mortariums are known to have been used to make and prepare garum. A few weeks after this I had my first trip to Rome, where in one of the museums I happen to see some samian ware which I took photos of to add to this article for context (Fig.15). I continued to pick up pottery sherds from both sides of the ditch which you can see in Fig.16. I took the sherds to North Herts Museum to see Keith in person, and he was able to date most of them to various parts of the Roman period. But three sherds in particular he was able to date to the late Iron Age, as marked in red in Fig.17. It’s great evidence that this site may have been active before the Roman occupation of Britain, it’s just a shame I found no metal artefacts to back this up… yet.

So with my time on this site at an end, I think overall it’s been quite successful. But if I’m honest, with the amount of pottery sherds I was seeing, I would have expected to find a lot more on the metallic finds front than I did. It makes me wonder if other detectorists have been here in the years since the early 1990’s? If they have, and they found things after 1997, then none of it has been recorded on the Portable Antiquities Scheme, which is frustrating. But then it’s also possible that there isn’t much to find here metal wise, but then all those pottery sherds…

Still, I think my metal detecting survey has been a good start to get our understanding of what was happening here underway. There were 18 Roman coins in total (Fig.18), as well as other artefacts and a good scatter of pottery sherds, so what does this tell us? Well, I’m not an archaeologist so I couldn’t begin to tell you, other than the broader period is definitely Roman. So I leave the question of what was going on here to Gil and Keith, who, with their expertise, will hopefully have an opinion which I can add to this article in due course.

Finds identified IV

They say if you can find work doing something you love, then it’s not like work at all. It’s fairy obvious that my passion is metal detecting, so when the hobby filters into my day job as a graphic designer, it feels like a real blessing. I have written a similar blog to this a few years back, when I had the brilliant opportunity to work on the design and layout of Finds Identified III. It’s tough not to repeat myself, because the process for putting this book together was pretty much the same as the last one, but the only difference this time is that I had the comfort of knowing what that process was. So I’m not going to repeat myself, if you want to know what the process was then you can refer to my blog post about Finds Identified III.

I have known that this book was in the works since I spoke to the guys from Greenlight Publishing at Detectival 2025. It’s always great to catch up with the Treasure Hunting Magazine team, and even better when you’re asked if you’d be up for doing the next book in the Finds Identified series. After finding out that I would be getting my greasy paws on this wonderful book series again, I had been chomping at the bit to get my teeth stuck in to it. But it wasn’t until March 2026 that the final draft of the text and images arrived in my inbox. A few months after that when the final design and layout had been signed off, it was then a waiting game wondering when the finished book would arrive on my doorstop, and today is that day!

It’s a great feeling when something you have worked on for a good amount of time finally materialises as a finished hardback book. I feel privileged that Kevin Leahy and Michael Lewis have trusted me once again with their years of hard work compiling this book, and even better that ther are happy with the end result. Lastly I would like to thank the guys at Treasure Hunting Magazine and Greenlight Publishing for letting me loose on Finds Identified IV. I have thoroughly enjoyed the process once again, and hopefully this won’t be the last time that my name appears on the credits to one of these fabulous books. It never gets old seeing your name in print!

P.S. If you want to buy this, and the other incredible books in the Finds Identified series then you can click on the link that I have provided at the end of this post. And don’t forget to follow me on instagram, there is a link to for that too. 🙂

Treasure Hunting Aug-2026

This month sees my latest article, ‘Detecting with Shmee150’, appear as a feature in the August edition of Treasure Hunting Magazine. It’s always a brilliant feeling to have my articles published, as writing has become an extension of the hobby that I love and keeps me occupied when detecting isn’t possible. The whole experience of gaining this permission, spending time with Tim (Shmee150), appearing in one of his YouTube videos, and writing the article has been surreal. The journey I’ve had with metal detecting over the past six years has been one big adventure, with lots of twists and turns, most of which have been incredibly positive. This particular twist in the journey with Tim will hopefully continue, as I’ll be allowed back in the autumn and winter months when the conditions are much more favourable for detecting. Hopefully, this will bring about some better finds – and, with a bit of luck, that elusive Anglo-Saxon coin.

Upon the release of the August edition of Treasure Hunting Magazine, I promised I would drop a copy off to Tim, along with the Austin Healey 100 that he wanted as a keepsake. This ended up being another great experience, as Tim invited me to the Shmuseum to drop the bits off, which resulted in a private guided tour of the garage and all the cars. Once again, it highlights Tim’s generosity in giving up some of his time and sharing his knowledge of the cars in his collection, all of which are pretty special. It was great to hear some of the stories behind these cars and to gain a bit of insider information about what’s going to happen with the collection in the future. 😉

It’s fair to say that everything about this article, from beginning to end, has been pretty special and memorable. Thanks to Tim’s open invitation to come back and do some more detecting in the future, there will hopefully be a lot more to add to this story – so watch this space!

Nighthawking

Nighthawking is not a subject that I really want to be talking about, but the circumstances in which I found this coin need calling out. This beautiful Iron Age coin that I found at the weekend is known as a ‘Hadham Heart Ear type’ silver unit, and it’s attributed to the North Thames region/Catuvellauni, dating to the period c. 60–20 BC (Figs. 1a-1b). Having contacted Liz at Ancient British Coins, it turns out that this little gem is extremely rare. This is what she had to say: “It is actually a type we call Hadham Corkscrew because of the hair. We’ve sold a couple of them; when we sold our last, there were eight others recorded, so it is likely still classed as an extremely rare type.” Needless to say, I’m over the moon with this find, but the situation in which I found it left me feeling incredibly sad.

There is a bit of a walk from the road to get to the field in which I found this coin, and when I got there I was greeted with a sea of unfilled holes (Fig. 2). This field had a crop of corn in it which had been harvested, so at first I thought it must have been a herd of deer rooting for leftover cobs. But when I started inspecting the holes, it became apparent that it was nighthawks, because deer wouldn’t leave unwanted finds in the unfilled holes (Fig. 3). It must have been a group of them because there were hundreds of holes – it was honestly heart-wrenching. I actually thought, what’s the point detecting here now? If anything was here, it’s probably now been taken.

I wasn’t going to mention this bit, but actually it might resonate with some people. These days, at the age of 53, I find myself tapping into the more spiritual side of life—not in a woo-woo kind of way, but losing that need and want for material things and looking for connections with the natural world, and in turn with myself. For whatever reason, I decided to stay and do some detecting, and in that moment I knelt down, put my hand on the ground, and said, “Let me find you today.” Literally within ten minutes, this Celtic silver unit came up. I couldn’t believe it – the patch it came out of was surrounded by unfilled holes. It actually sent a little shiver down my spine. How on earth did they miss it?

The field in question does have an Iron Age feature in it, which is probably the reason the nighthawks were there. The field had recently been deep-ploughed and raked, so they must have had their eyes on it for quite some time. It really is shameful that this stuff goes on, but how do we stop it? Those of us who detect responsibly, which is the vast majority of detectorists, are affected by this crap. Permissions are ever decreasing because of it, and I don’t blame the farmers for refusing permission when they see their fields full of unfilled holes and history being stolen. I guess all we can do is call it out when we see it and notify the landowners, in the hope that at some point they may be caught in the act and dealt with.

But at least this little chap won’t end up on eBay or the black market, and instead I can share it for everyone to see. This will now be the ninth coin of this type recorded – I think that’s pretty cool.

Detecting with Shmee150

Wow, where do I begin with this one? Well, I guess it all starts from when I took up metal detecting again nearly six years ago, in September 2020. It was also around this time that I started following Tim’s ‘Shmee150’ channel on YouTube (Fig. 1). For anyone who isn’t familiar with Tim’s channel, his content is all about supercars and hypercars. The channel began about 15 years ago when Tim started filming short videos of supercars during his work breaks in London, which he then started uploading to YouTube. Over the years, due to a lot of hard graft, brilliant content, and great video production, the followers of the channel have grown to such numbers that it has allowed Tim to curate the collection of cars he has today (Fig. 2).

I’ve always had an interest in cars, ever since I was a young lad – not that you would know it by the car that I drive. But I remember watching a film in the late 1970s called ‘The Gumball Rally’, which started my love affair with my favourite car, the AC Cobra (Fig. 3. I had to include this, lol).

During the Covid lockdowns, I found Tim’s content to be a form of escapism, and I really enjoyed his presenting style. Not only did he come across as being incredibly knowledgeable about the cars, but you could see a genuine passion for what he was doing, and that felt very authentic. The other thing I liked about the channel is that his car collection didn’t just sit in the garage; he actually drove the cars as intended, taking them on race tracks (Fig.4) and epic adventures – not just in the UK; he did this globally (Fig.5) . So I became a subscriber to his channel, never thinking that my passion for metal detecting would one day see me feature in one of his YouTube videos, but here we are (Fig. 6).

A new permission

So, moving to the present day, this all came about because of an Instagram post that Tim shared about a post. This was a fence post to be specific (Fig. 7), along with a question asking if anybody knew of a company that could provide the same kind of fencing in Hertfordshire. It was ‘Hertfordshire’ that grabbed my attention because that is my neck of the woods. I could see in the background of the picture that there were some fields, so I replied to the post, saying, “Ooohh, that land looks perfect for metal detecting, are you the owner Shmee?” I honestly didn’t think I would get a reply, but reply he did: “Owner, yes, I hadn’t even considered metal detecting on it.”

From that point on, we had about a month of back and forth over email, trying to arrange a suitable date for me to come along and do some metal detecting on his newly acquired land. Tim had literally just moved to the area, buying a property which he and his wife, Anna, consider to be a forever home, but it also has enough land to build a new garage to house his car collection, known as ‘The Shmuseum’ (Fig. 8). This has created a new avenue of YouTube content for Tim, following his journey with the new property and the creation of a brand-new Shmuseum.

A twist in the tale

Those of you who are regular readers will know that I have written quite a few articles for Treasure Hunting Magazine to date, something which has turned into a hobby in itself and one that I really enjoy. So I asked Tim if he would mind me writing an article about detecting on his land, to which he replied, “Absolutely, no problem at all, and maybe we can feature you doing some metal detecting in one of our videos.” This was a twist I didn’t expect, and it turned my first time detecting on his land into more of an adventure than my usual detecting escapades hunting for buried history.

Time for some research

With any new permission, I will do the necessary due diligence, and with Tim’s land being just five minutes down the road from me, I already knew a lot about the area. It’s local common knowledge that there are the remains of a motte-and-bailey castle and the site of an Anglo-Saxon settlement, with an associated burial ground nearby. But what I didn’t know is that there is a suspected Romano-British temple site in the vicinity too. I found this out by talking to the retired archaeologist Gil Burleigh, who said, “There is a probable late Iron Age and Romano-British temple site nearby. We’ve recorded finds made by metal detectorists in the 1990s, including probable votive objects such as a miniature votive axe, coins, and brooches, etc.”

So, there is a lot of stuff going on in the area in a historical sense, which got me quite excited, but as I have learned from previous experiences, I needed to curb my enthusiasm. Part of my research included looking on the Portable Antiquities Scheme database to see if any metal detecting finds had been recorded in the area. The PAS database will let you search for items found within a 1 km square, and the grid reference for the 1 km square that Tim’s land sits within came up with… nothing.

As I have come to learn from my research on other sites, this doesn’t necessarily mean that nothing has ever been found here. It may be the case that things were found before the Portable Antiquities Scheme was set up, in which case finds weren’t required to be reported. It could be that things have been found here in recent years but, for whatever reason, they haven’t been handed in for recording – unlikely, I think. But there is also the possibility that no metal detecting has ever taken place here, in which case at some point on this journey we may find some good history.

Not what I was expecting

On the morning I arrived at Tim’s property, I wrongly assumed that because we had never met in person before, we would introduce ourselves and have a chat before any filming took place – how wrong could I be? For anyone who has seen the video in which I appear, our first meeting is as you see it (Fig. 9). From the moment I was coming down the drive, I could see Tim and his wife, Anna, were already filming. It then dawned on me that there was going to be no prep, and my heart sank. I honestly thought the filming Tim wanted to do would just be a couple of minutes of me detecting, so I wasn’t prepared for the full-on chat, which, if you watch the video, you can probably tell. For some reason, in my flustered state, my research brain switched on and totally off the cuff I started telling Tim about the history that surrounds his plot of land – it’s a good job I like doing my research!

I did take the opportunity at this point to show Tim some of the better finds from my other permissions that I have found over the years (Figs. 10a–13). I thought it would be prudent to have something to show Tim to give him an insight into the amazing things that can be found, just in case we didn’t find anything of any note on his land. It goes without saying that most detectorists know that historical finds are not always to be found in every field that we search.

After the initial 10 minutes or so of filming, Tim turned the camera off, and we then had an informal chat. He then explained the reason for filming straight away. He did apologise but said people are usually more authentic and natural in front of the camera if things aren’t scripted and planned, and I totally get that. But this experience has taught me that if it happens again, I should at least have some structure to the things that I want to talk about.

An old rusty nail

But now it was time to get down to business and do some metal detecting. The areas where I could detect were divided into three plots: two of them pasture and one of them cultivated (Fig. 14). We first looked at one of the pasture plots, but it was a bit too overgrown to get the coil close enough to the ground for it to be effective. So we went over to the cultivated plot, which was the biggest field and perfect for starting the detecting journey.

Tim and Anna were filming from the minute I turned the detector on, so I was really feeling the pressure to find something fairly quickly (Fig. 15). Because we were talking throughout the filming, I was unable to wear my headphones, which made it difficult to properly understand the sounds that were coming through from the detector. We hit a signal within minutes and it did sound a little bit iffy, but as it was the first signal, I decided to dig it. It became blatantly apparent to me after I made that decision that the target in question was iron. So, the first find on filmed Tim’s land was a rusty iron nail (Fig. 16) – how embarrassing is that! But even worse, the filming then stopped, so that was the only live bit of metal detecting that was recorded.

I had a sleepless night that night, thinking it’s really not a good look to be pulling out an iron nail, and the next morning I even contacted Tim to see if we could edit that bit. Tim was great about it but said, “I’ll send you over the clip and you can take a look at it. You called the iron before you pulled it out, so it’s not as bad as you think.” And he was right, I had called it (something I thought I said in my head and not out loud), and actually, it made me think that this is the reality of metal detecting. Admittedly, if I had had the headphones on I wouldn’t have dug an iron nail, but sometimes this stuff gets through no matter how good your detector is. And the more I think about it, it probably would have looked a bit suspect if I had pulled out a hammered coin or something else that would have been considered a good find on the first hole dug.

Time for some proper detecting

From that point on, I was pretty much left to my own devices, so the real searching began. Staying in the main field, I did an initial search following a figure-of-eight pattern. I walked straight up one edge of the field, then diagonally across to the opposing corner, then up the other side and diagonally across to the other corner. Not a lot came up, really – a few buttons, a couple of coins, a bit of a broken buckle, and the head of a broken thimble as seen in Fig. 17. It was at this point I started to get the feeling that this permission wasn’t going to produce in the way I had hoped. Knowing the history that existed in this area, I was hopeful that some good stuff would come up. I mentioned in the video that my number one bucket lister would be an Anglo-Saxon coin – always a long shot, but if you’re going to hope for something… yeah, I’m a dreamer right? I do actually own an Anglo-Saxon coin, though sadly not a real one, but I did strike it myself last summer at the Beautiful Days Festival (Figs. 18a–19).

I carried on a bit longer in this field, concentrating in a sort of boxed alcove in the top corner. This is where I found the first bit of late medieval history in the form of a lead steelyard weight, which dates AD. 1350-1600 (Fig. 20). Keith Fitzpatrick-Matthews, the Curator and Heritage Access Officer at North Herts Museums, very kindly found a similar example on the PAS database, which is how I know. A fair amount of rubbish was coming up, which is to be expected (Fig. 21), so at this point I decided to stop and have my lunch with my attention then turning to the pasture fields.

Time for some sheep

Tim did mention that he was expecting the arrival of some sheep on the same day that I was detecting, and that they would be released into the two pasture fields, one of which I was already in. And sure enough, not long after I started detecting, the sheep arrived (Fig. 22). The farmer who owned the sheep came over and had a quick chat with me to say the sheep wouldn’t bother me, and to ask if I had found anything interesting. Sadly, at that point I didn’t have much to show other than the lead weight, but at least I knew the sheep weren’t going to be a problem.

I carried on for a bit longer before the weather stopped play for the day, but a few more bits did come up, including a Zippo-style lighter with the initials RKF on it (Fig. 23). I also had part of a barrel tap, a lead seal, a possible lead spindle whorl, a musket ball, the shaft of an old straw splitter, a car tyre valve, a few more buttons, and a possible half of a strap end (Fig. 24). I also had a mystery object which left me a bit stumped, but it looked to have some age to it due to the patina, so maybe it’s a broken part of something a reader might recognise? (Fig. 25).

On the return to my car, Tim didn’t seem too disappointed with the finds; in fact, he was quite enthusiastic about it all. I guess it’s because there was actually some history there, evidence of people living and working in times gone by on the land that he now owns. I think it’s because I’m lucky enough to constantly find Iron Age, Roman, and medieval finds on my other permissions that it makes the more recent history not quite so interesting. But Tim’s enthusiasm has reminded me that even the more modern stuff is still history. These are finds that I used to get excited about when I first started metal detecting, when the hobby was all new to me – something I’m glad I’ve been reminded of.

Once I had packed up, Tim and Anna then invited me into the house for a cup of tea. It was great to have another informal chat about all things cars and the plans for the new Shmuseum and the rest of the property – and even better to have an open offer to come back and do some more detecting, which, as you can imagine, I absolutely did!

The second coming

A couple of weeks later, I was back again, and this time without the pressure of any filming. On the day I was detecting, Tim and Anna were going to be away from the house for most of the day, so Tim let me in just before they were about to head off. So, without any pressure and better weather conditions, I was left to my own devices. I spent time in all three fields again, and the sheep were waiting to greet me with a bit more inquisitiveness this time, even plucking up the courage to come over and give me a little sniff (Fig. 26). I pretty much had the same results as the last outing, finds-wise, with more buttons, coins and a few other odds and sods as you can see in Figs. 27–29. But then one find came up which really couldn’t have been more appropriate considering the passions of Tim’s life and career.

The perfect find!

In my head, it felt like a moment from the TV show Detectorists – you know, the beginning of episode two from season one. Lance: “What you got?” Andy: “Matchbox car… Chevrolet Corvette… how in God’s name does that get out into the middle of a field in Essex?” Only in my case it was a 1950s Dinky Austin Healey 100 in the middle of a field in North Hertfordshire (Fig. 31). This little automotive wonder was in pretty bad shape, and sadly I don’t think it’s a case for restoration – but still, what a great find. When I sent this pic to Tim, his reaction was brilliant: “This is by far my favourite thing you could have found.” A bit later on I found the rear end of a Rover 3500 (Fig. 31), hmmm, a bit of a car theme starting to develop here!

When I got home, I gave the Austin Healey the small clean-up that it deserved, and weirdly it looks pretty cool in a knackered, beat-up wreck kind of way (Fig. 32). These finds ended the day’s session, but hopefully in the future there will be some more opportunities to detect on Tim’s land. Maybe when some of the landscaping takes place, it will bring some new things to the surface, like an Anglo-Saxon coin – hey, a dreamer can dream!

This hobby has been good to me

This hobby of metal detecting, and the journey it’s taking me on over the years, never ceases to amaze me. It started out as a journey of discovering history, but it’s turned into so much more than that. It’s brought me into contact with some brilliant people, including Julian Evan-Hart, the editor of Treasure Hunting Magazine, who has encouraged me to keep writing these articles, which I love doing. It has also filtered into my work life as a graphic designer, where I have helped out the Treasure Hunting team with the magazine on occasion. That then led to me being asked to put together the design and layout for the book Finds Identified III (as seen in Fig. 33), and I’m currently working on Finds Identified IV, which is just brilliant. This hobby has also brought me into contact with Keith Fitzpatrick-Matthews and Gilbert Burleigh, whose experience and continuous generosity in sharing their seemingly limitless knowledge as professionals in the field of archaeology has been invaluable, both for my detecting and writing these articles. It’s also reconnected me with old friends, and brought me into contact with new ones, you know who you all are.

Now this hobby has brought me into contact with Tim (Fig. 34), a YouTuber that I have been following for years, never imagining that one day our paths would cross. And yet, due to this brilliant hobby, I’m now featuring in one of the videos on his YouTube channel. The video in question (Fig. 4) has had quite a few views now, which I’m sure is due to the sheep arriving and not me metal detecting – but it was great to be a part of it. I can only hope that I didn’t embarrass myself or the metal detecting community too much. I mean, pulling out an iron nail on the first hole… ugh!

But still, I got to write an article which features fast cars and metal detecting – what’s not to love! I must say a big thank you to Tim and Anna for their hospitality, for letting me loose on their land, and for their generosity with the use of images, a few of which were specifically taken for this article. To have myself and the wonderful hobby of metal detecting feature in one of Tim and Anna’s videos has been a memorable experience, even if the finds weren’t quite what we were hoping for.

It just leaves me to wonder where this brilliant hobby will take me next. Well, I actually already know, but that’s another article waiting to be written. Until then, if you like the articles that I write, or you’re interested in taking a gander at the things that I find, you can head over to my website: hertfordshirehistoryhunter.co.uk. I think of it as my digital garden shed, my little part of the internet where I potter about with all things metal detecting. 🙂

Treasure Hunting Feb-2026

So 2026 has started off well for me with my first article of the year appearing in the February issue of Treasure Hunting Magazine. It’s always great to have an article published in the magazine and hopefully this will be the first of many for this year. This article is all about my biggest permission which I have been detecting on for a few years now.

It’s a strange one this because a short time after I had submitted this article I found out that Detectival was going to take place here. That, as you can imagine was a bit of a shock, but I managed to overcome my initial dismay and things ended up turning out quite well.

A great opportunity presented itself which led to me helping out in the finds tent, recording peoples finds as they came in off the fields. As you may have seen I’ve written a separate article about that experience which will be appearing in Treasure Hunting Magazine in the next couple of months. I also have a few ideas bubbling away for some more articles this year, one of which could be quite unusual so keep an eye out for those as well.

It’s fair to say that this hobby of metal detecting is definitely my biggest passion when it comes to pastime pleasures. But a close second to that is writing this blog. On rainy days like today where it’s not really possible to go out detecting, writing acts as a supplement that fills the hole otherwise occupied by the disappointment of not being out in the fields. It’s like a second home for my love affair with metal detecting, a place where I can still exercise my passion for this great hobby without having to get wet.

I have no idea if anyone reads my blog or if people actually like the articles I write which appear in Treasure Hunting Magazine. But in a world where everything seems to be about creating videos and pumping out endless clickbait, I think it’s good to be doing something a little less ‘in your face’. I like the idea that someone may happen across my little website and then read and learn about the history that I find. For me it’s like a little historical curiosity shop that I keep adapting and adding too, a place where history is shared and always visible.

This was always my intention when I started the blog, I just felt the little bits of history that I find deserve be seen. These everyday discoveries were once part of peoples lives, lives that filled pockets of time in the centuries before us. They are reminders of the lives we never knew but should never forget, because our past is what shapes who we are today.

Volunteering at Detectival

It’s taken me a long time to sit down and finally want to write this blog post. That’s because for many who dabble in the wonderful hobby of metal detecting it can be, and very often is an emotional past time. There are a myriad of reasons for the emotional side of searching for the past in the ground, all of which I think are good for the soul. For some it’s the thrill that comes with finding Iron Age or Roman coins and artefacts, or any historical finds for that matter. For others it’s being out in the country air which can be a great tonic for the stresses that life can bring. For a lot of us it’s a combination of both, although detecting can bring it’s own stress in the form of frustration when a day out doesn’t produce in the way that you think it should.

The reason it’s taken so long for me to sit down and write this is simply because I didn’t know how I would approach it. Decetctival 2025 was very conflicting for me because it took place on a permission which I have been detecting on for quite a few years now. I’m out on this permission most of my free weekends and I have come to know the place really well through research and endless hours walking in the fields. So when I found out that Detectival was going to take place here my heart sank. The thought of 1500+ detectorists searching the permission that I have come to know and love filled me with a certain amount of dread.

Coming to terms

Don’t get me wrong, I’m not against group digs, they are a brilliant way for people to take part in the hobby who haven’t been able to get their own permissions. I have been on a few smaller group digs myself when I was starting out and they have certainly helped in fueling what is now a life long passion for this hobby. But, and this is where I am going to sound like a NIMBY, it’s a completely different proposition when one of these events takes place on your own permission, especially one the size of Detectival.

I found out about six weeks before the event took place when a lot of the fields still had crops in. There were a lot fields I had been waiting to get into which meant when they became available it only gave me a few weekends to search them before Detectival took place. The fields in question had a mix of Iron Age, Roman and Medieval features all of which have given up good finds in previous years. So I spent those weekends searching as much of those fields as I could, and they didn’t disappoint as you can see in Figs.1-6.

Embrace the inevitable

I decided to embrace Detectival taking place on my permission, after all there was nothing I could do about it. But then an unexpected opportunity presented itself which I couldn’t turn down. For the past year I have been a member of the North Hertfordshire Archaeological Society, and they were approached by Anni Byard, the Archaeologist & Small Finds Specialist who heads up the finds team (Middle Ground Archaeology) for Detectival. She was looking for volunteers to help record the finds over the weekend, so of course I Jumped at the chance. I figured it would be great to get a different perspective on our hobby and see what life is really like recording finds.

I was due to help out in the finds tent on the Sunday, so I decided to do a bit of detecting on the Saturday. Taking to one side meeting some brilliant people, I have to admit that I didn’t enjoy the detecting part of it, being surrounded by crowds of detectorists on my permission was not fun. One of the many things I love about detecting is the solitude of being on my own or sometimes with a mate or two, but this… nah, not for me. Unsurprisingly on my short lived session I didn’t really find anything of note, other than one of the musical variety (note that is) which I think was once an earring (Fig.7). Still, it’s always nice to have a bit of silver up.

A day in the life

On Sunday I turned up at the finds tent a little before time and settled in with a nice cup of tea whilst introducing myself to a few others who were already there. The finds tent was due to open at 10:00am so at 9:30am Anni Byard introduced herself to us all and talked us through the processes we would be involved with for the day. I was tasked along with 3 or 4 others with recording the finds as they came in using the handwritten forms shown in Figs.8-9. This really did feel like being thrown in at the deep end as the detectorists and their finds came in thick and fast.

Initially I was going to write an article about the detectorists and their finds thinking that working in the finds tent would give me the time to talk to people, but boy was I wrong. The process of recording finds went as fast as we could write, and being that most detectorists had more than one find to record the pace was pretty slow. Each find had to be recorded individually with the details of the finder and the rough location of the find spot. The finds were then bagged with a numbered ticket, this number was written on the finds form and the other half of the ticket was given to the finder. The finds with their forms were then passed back to the brilliant archaeologists and finds specialists, who then went through the unenviable process of identifying, photographing and writing up their descriptions of the finds to complete the forms. Once this was done the find itself went into the return display (Fig.10) where the finders could present their numbered tickets and retrieve their finds.

Although the process was slow the day itself went pretty quick, probably the result of us being very busy for most of it. I’m grateful to have had the opportunity to work with the Middle Ground Archaeology team and to get a glimpse of what goes on when I leave my finds with my local finds liason officer. It has certainly opened my eyes to the incredible amount of work they have to do, and because our hobby is growing in popularity that work is becoming increasingly harder. Many detectorists (including myself) moan about the fact that we’re having to wait month’s, even years sometimes to collect the finds we hand in to be recorded. Currently I have waited over a year to pick up my latest set of finds, so I get the frustration that many (again including myself) feel about having to wait so long. But experiencing first hand the work that archaeologists, finds specialists and finds liason officers have to do recording finds, I now have a bit more understanding of their timescales and a little less frustration towards it. Talking to some of the archaeologists and finds specialists on the day it seems the problem is lack of staff which in turn is due to lack of funding, an issue which unfortunately isn’t felt by the Portable Antiquties Scheme alone.

The day ended with a group shot of the finds recording team shown in Fig.11 (I’m on the right handside wearing a white t-shirt). This was a great combination of professional archaeologists, finds specialists and volunteers working together for the benefit of those detectorists giving up their time to search for history. I met some brilliant people and saw some amazing finds, although there was a small part of me thinking ‘those finds should have been my discoveries’. But on the other hand this permission is huge and I could spend the rest of my life detecting here and miss most of the things that were found this weekend, well thats the thought I’m comforting myself with.

Life after detectival

So now the behemoth event that is Detectival has left town and I’m back to the wonderful solitude on this permission (Fig.12). The event itself seemed to go pretty well and was extremely well organised. On the Saturday when I was part of the crowd everyone seemed to be having a good time. Wether they were detecting, eating from the food vendors, having a few drinks listening to live music, chatting to the various experts from the leading detecting brands or just enjoying the wonderful North Hertfordshire countryside, the atmosphere was great. What struck me most is that the detecting community is a welcoming, friendly and embracing one. I think it’s because of the passion we all share for this amazing hobby, that passion just ouses out of you when you’re chatting to fellow detectorists which in turn creates that friendly and embracing atmosphere. With the way things are in world events at the moment I think human beings need more of this kind of feeling, maybe detecting is the answer to world peace, lol.

Thankfully for me and the few other detectorists who detect here on a regular basis, some of the fields on this permission weren’t available to Detectival. This is manly due to crops still be in but it’s something we are incredibly grateful for. To stand in some of the fields directly after the event and look at the sea of footprints and refilled holes was quite depressing. Going into any field that was available to Detectival felt like a pointless endeavour as they were all the same, foot prints and refilled holes. So when the crops came out of the remaining fields it was a relief and game on again.

As you can see in Figs.13-17 some fantastic finds have come up for me since Detectival, some of my best from this permission in fact. The sestertius of Trajan is one of the best condition Roman coins I have ever found, with it’s size and weight making it such a lovely object to touch and hold. The silver ‘stag’ unit of Tasciovanus is one of the rarest objects I have ever found, with I believe only a dozen recorded examples. So this permission still has some burried secrets to give up for me to share with you which keeps me and my passion for this hobby very happy. I have no doubt that when the fields many of you experienced at Detectival are ploughed again they will bring up a few more amazing lost artefacts wanting to be found. And you can be absolutely sure, if I find them then I will share there discoveries with you on my Instagram feed. As always the link to my Instagram is just below, go on you know you want to follow the Hertfordshire History Hunter.

WM 09 – Freedom of choice

Last year I had an issue with the Minelab ML 85 headphones which came with my equinox 900. The volume button on the side of the headphones stopped working which made for a lack lustre experience whilst out detecting. They were under warranty so I sent them back explaining the issue to LP Metal Detecting, from who I originally purchased my Equinox 900. LP, as always were brilliant, and a new set of headphones were sent out in a matter of days. But whilst I was waiting for my headphones to arrive I decided to look at what options there were for alternative headphones to use with the Equinox 900, and surprisingly there wasn’t any.

It turns out the only wireless headphones that can be used with my detector are the limited offerings from Minlab, the ML-85 and the ML-105. The ML-85’s that I had were ok and I can’t really fault them as a set of wireless headphones for a metal detector, but they do have some issues. This mainly comes from the fact that they are an ‘over-ear’ design, which does have benefits but also has drawbacks. The two issues for me are that in winter it stops me from wearing my thick knit beanie and in summer my ears sweat like Jabba the Hutt in a rebel sauna!

I thought that this was something that I would just have to live with, until that is I lost my second pair of ML-85 headphones. How did you loose them I hear you ask? It pains me to have to admit it, but I will as it enlightened me to the possibilities that were presented as a result of the loss. Ok, here goes, I left them on the roof of the car as I was packing my gear in the boot! Sad I know but there it is, I drove off and somewhere along the journey the headphones took a leap from the roof of my car. I only noticed a few days later when I went detecting again, obviously I realised what must have happened and went back to the same spot just incase they were there, but to no avail. For that session I used the old wired headphones from my Equinox 600 and I soon realised how much of an inconvenience having your headphones physically tethered to your detector actually is.

Now I was in the market for another set of headphones, so back to the LP Metal Detecting website I went. I was just about to click on the link for a new set of ML-85’s when I noticed this little black box called the Minelab WM 09 Wireless Audio Module. This little gadget is designed to give you the freedom to use whatever wired headphones you want (wirelessly) with my Minelab Equinox 900. Now, I know a lot of people are going to pick up on the fact that it enables me to use wired headphones and not wireless, but for me at least this is a good thing.

I have never really been a fan of wireless headphones for two reasons, the first of which is I’m not keen on the wireless reception being that close to my head. Call me a conspiracy tin hat wearer if you want (I’m not BTW), but if I have a choice to use wired headphones over wireless ones then I will. Secondly I think you get a much better quality headphone for your money with wired versions as you are not paying the extra for the wireless technology. A case in point was when I purchased a pair of Sennheiser Momentum 2.0 headphones, they had the option of being wired or wireless, exactly the same headphones but with a difference of about £100 for the wireless version, wired seemed like a no brainer for me.

So knowing that the WM 09 would give me the freedom to use my own wired headphones made it a very easy purchase. I do think the price at £169 is a little excessive for what it is, but with the 10% discount which you can get from the many detectorists who are affiliated with LP does make it a little more palatable.

There isn’t a huge amount I can say about the device itself as it’s quite simple in both deign and what it delivers. There are two buttons on the front, one to turn it on and the other to connect it wirelessly to the detector. The LED between the two buttons flashes blue when you turn it on and then when you have paired it with your detector it will periodically flash to indicate the connection is secure. The LED on the bottom right will show red when the battery is running low, and when charging it will flash green, then turning to solid green when its fully charged (exactly the same as the Equinox 900 charging sequence) .

It’s a cool looking gadget which wouldn’t look out of place on Batman’s utility belt, should he ever need to go detecting that is. On the back of the WM 09 is a well designed clip which enables me to attach it to my belt or any point of fixation on my batman… er sorry, detecting utility vest. But it’s what this little black box offers in terms of choice which has won me over, and that is I get to wear my favourite IEM’s the Fiio FH3’s which connect easily to the WM 09’s 3.5mm headphone socket.

This immediately solves my two issues with the ML-85 over ear headphones. I can now wear my thick knit beanie in the winter and snugly keep my ears warm without the bulky over ear cups getting in the way, and as I found out on my first detecting session using my new audio system, no more sweaty ears in the hot sun! I honestly think Minelab have done themselves a great service making this device available for their new range of detectors and it’s made me very happy in the process.

As I said earlier the wired IEM’s that I’m using are Fiio’s FH3’s, which for entry level audiophile headphones are bloody brilliant. I have been super impressed with these headphones which I use regularly with my iPod, and I now benefit from that a better quality of sound for my detecting. The physical aspect of using wired headphones is no issue either as I just run the wire under my t-shirt which keeps it from getting in the way of detecting and digging as it’s not directly attached to the detector. 

This short review is not finished yet so I will come back to it towards the end of the year when I have got some proper hours under my belt using this new set up. So far the ease of use and the freedom it has given me to wear my own headphones is a big win, but the ultimate conclusion will come with time. Transitioning from summer to winter in the coming months means I can test this device in both the scenarios in which I think it will make my life easier. The more uncertain test from here on then is whether the wireless connection to my detector that WM09 will provide is any good?

The big permission

Back in 2022 I wrote an article for the September edition of Treasure Hunting Magazine titled “Where have all the finds gone?”. At the end of that article I mentioned that my time there had come to an end for that season, but I wouldn’t get to go back out on these fields for another couple of years.

Detecting on this permission began again in January 2024, and now that I had a map outlining all the fields which were part of this permission I was able to do some proper research into the area. This included using Google Earth, the Heritage England Aerial Archaeology Mapping Explorer, the Heritage England Aerial Photo Explorer, and scouring through endless aerial photos on the Cambridge Air Photos website. Having access to all these online tools gave me a brilliant insight into where would be good locations to start the detecting journey here once again. I spent my first afternoon in a field which was next to the one that contained the Roman villa which featured in the 2022 article. Not a lot came up, but on walking back to the car these two little silver gems in Fig.1 appeared. The brooch, with a thistle design, is hallmarked which tells me it was made in Chester in 1913 by Charles Horner, the button, though a bit worse for wear, is roughly dated to the 18th Century (Georgian), a nice end to an otherwise crappy afternoon.

On the Romans

My second port of call was the corner of one field where a rectangular enclosure had shown up on google earth and some of the aerial photography. Fortunately for me I am now also able to ask questions of Keith Fitzpatrick-Matthews (the Curator and Heritage Access Officer at North Herts Museums) and Gilbert Burliegh (the retired archaeologist who oversaw the excavation of the Ashwell ‘Dea Senuna’ Hoard, and the once former boss of Keith). I showed the aerial photography to Gil and asked for his thoughts on what it might be which were as follows… “It looks like a Romano-British ditched enclosure, possibly originating in the late Iron Age”. It would turn out that his assumptions from looking at the aerial photography would be spot on!

The first day on that corner of the field was cold but sunny and the green shoots of a crop had just started to push through (Fig.2). Even though this was the case it didn’t stop me from spotting pottery sherds scattered around, and lots of them (Fig.3). I messaged Keith to see if it was ok to pick some up to bring in to him to identify, which was fine as long as I provided the find spot locations as well. It turned out that most of it was Roman, but one sherd in particular was part of a mortarium (Fig.4), which in modern terms is part a mortar bowl with which we use a pestle to grind herbs and such. With all this pottery scattered about it wasn’t long before the Roman coins started to pop up. I had 12 Roman coins in all (Fig.5) and then rather pleasingly a Celtic Tasciovanos Verlamio bronze unit (20BC-10AD) turned up as well (Fig.6), which fits with Gil’s thoughts on the site perfectly, ten out of ten for Gil!

The silver denarius

Within the coins on Fig.5 you will notice that there is a silver denarius, which when I found it was a real heart stopping moment. The reason being is that the first side of the coin I saw was the reverse which carried the word Caesar (Fig.7a-7b). I can only think of one man when I see or hear the word Caesar and that is Julius Caesar. For a moment I was overwhelmed with finding a coin of one of the greatest historical figures ever known, until I sent a photo of it to Keith who immediately came back and said that it was his great nephew Octavian. But this was still impressive, to find a silver denarius from the Republic era and one which carried the head of Octavian who later became Augustus Caesar and founded the Roman Empire. This particular coin dates to the period AD 32-29 BC (RIC I 257, RSC I Augustus 61) and it is said to refer to the Battle of Naulochus. I mentioned this because the Battle of Naulochus took place on 3rd September 36BC, the date of which (excusing the year) is my birthday, how cool is that!

Towards the end of 2024 I attended a talk which Keith Fitzpatrick-Matthews gave on the history of the local area, part of which was my permission. It turns out that the silver denarius of Octavian which I had found became a small feature of his presentation and Keith has kindly shared that part of his talk here.

“The discovery of a silver denarius of Octavian is unusual from an Iron Age to Romano-British farmstead. Its reverse legend Caesar Di(vi filius), ‘son of the deified Caesar’, shows the future emperor Augustus positioning himself as the rightful ruler of the Roman world around the time of his conflict with Mark Antony and Cleopatra VII for dominance.”

“Republican and early imperial denarii do sometimes turn up in Roman contexts in Britain: more than 2000 have been found. Some were brought in by the armies of invasion or circulated as part of the general introduction of Roman coinage, but others come from pre-Roman Late Iron Age sites. Some were imported to be melted down into coins struck by British rulers, including Tincomarus and Epillus of the Atrebates, while others were used as coins because their weight matched that of British coinage”.

Not a lot else came up on the site of this enclosure, but maybe more will turn up after the plough in a few years.

Across the road

This wasn’t the only site of interest that I had spotted in my research, on the other side of the road there were more rectangular features which needed my attention. Beyond the trees (Fig.8) was a huge field that had a lot going on in it and as always I was hopeful of finding lots of Roman goodies. The field I was stood in when I took the photo of the trees also had a rectangular feature in it but as yet I have not been able to detect there as it is currently occupied by a massive badgers set (Figs.9-10).

The bigger field beyond the trees didn’t produce the Roman bounty I was hoping for, but a few interesting things from various time periods were unearthed. There were a lot of finds from more modern times here, particularly buttons and coins as seen in Fig.11, but included in this shot is a small Celtic Unit (the toasted green nugget on the top of my finger). It wouldn’t be long before a few finds of a more significant variety would show themselves.

Two of those finds which I found on the same day were part of an Anglo-Saxon brooch, and a couple of broken fragments of a Roman Armilla bracelet (Figs.12-14). The pieces of Armilla don’t feature in the group shot (Fig.12) because they were in my scrap pocket at the time. It’s only when emptying my scrap pocket that I noticed the decoration which I recognised from a piece of Armilla which I found on another permission. When I showed these items to Gil, he replied with the following… “James, that is extremely significant. Armilla are associated with the Roman military in the 1st century AD. They are also associated with religious sites. Your site is shaping up to be very interesting indeed, not least because you have early pagan A-S evidence too”.

It’s worth mentioning at this point that the association of these bracelets with the Roman military is being questioned. Keith kindly steered me towards a PhD thesis authored by Dr Edwin Wood. Keith said “Something you may not be aware of is that Dr Edwin Wood has examined the distribution of so-called armillae in Britain in his PhD thesis and has discounted their military origin”. Keith continued to say “Interestingly, he compares their decoration with the recently-classified ‘Baldock torcs’ and with a particular type of nail cleaner associated with the town. I know that the interpretation of these bracelets as military is received wisdom and that anything supposedly associated with the Roman army gets people excited, but it might be good to throw out Wood’s significant doubts to a wider public”.

Another day in this field produced a few Roman coins and a beaten up silver hammered along with the usual buttons and modernish coins (Fig.15). But in the middle of all this was a piece copper alloy (which I assumed due to the green patina), and it was something that I had not seen before. This turned out to be part of a horse harness bridal bit (Fig.16) and I have just had it confirmed by FLO that it is from the Roman period. So with all the evidence that I have found so far in this short period of time, I think it’s safe to say that this area had been inhabited by the Celts, Romans and possibly the Anglo-Saxons, the picture these finds are building is starting to get interesting. It wasn’t long before this part of the permission was out of bounds due to the crops growing, but there were other parts of the permission still available.

The finds are scarce but still coming

I now moved to another part of the permission where things were looking quite busy on google earth. It was a section where there appeared to be lots of old boundaries all crossing over each other which shows up on multiple images on the google earth historical imagery time slider. This field was available for a couple of weeks so I made the most of the time, not a lot came up here but there was still evidence of Roman occupation. I found another piece of Roman mortarium (Fig.17) along with a copper alloy Nummus of Crispus Caesar (AD 317-326) (Figs.18a-18b), so the Romans were definitely around mixing their herbs and medicines.

Some more modern items showed up too including what I believe to be a book clasp (Fig.19) which was intricately decorated with Christian symbolism which conveys hope, faith and charity. I wonder if may have been part of a bible as there is a small village church just a stones throw from this field. Another day of detecting in this field produced my first complete silver spoon (Fig.20), albeit completely bent and twisted. But even so, the hallmarks were intact which told me that this spoon dated to 1804 and was made in London by William Ely & William Fearn, I wonder if there is a spoon missing from the family silver in one of the homes in the village, I’m sure someone got in trouble for that many years ago. You will also notice in Fig.20 a Roman coin at the top of my hand which has a hole in it, I assume because it was worn, possibly as a necklace? It’s something which features on a few of the Roman coins I have found here, so it seems it may have been a popular thing to do. It wasn’t long before this part of the permission was out of bounds too, so then onto the next part!

The Roman road

This time I was heading into a field which my research showed had a Roman Road running right the way through it. In fact this road ran past the big Roman villa complex which was in the first article that I wrote about this permission way back in the September 2022 edition of Treasure Hunting Magazine. I also found out that a Geophysics survey had taken place on a cross section of this field by the Community Archaeology Geophysics Group (CAGG) which showed part of the Roman road, so I knew it was definitely there (Fig.21).

As you can imagine I was quite hopeful of finding some good Roman artefacts here, but again I didn’t have a huge amount of time before this field was out of bounds too. But on the few outings that I did have there were some nice finds as you can see in Fig.22. Amongst this lot was a corroded Dupondius of Vespasian (Fig.23) along with my first Roman brooch to come up from this permission (Fig.24-25), I believe this to be a Hod Hill type brooch which would date it to the 1st Century AD. None of these things are in particularly great condition, but they are all indications of the people who were travelling and living in his area which is one of the reasons why I enjoy this hobby so much. Another little item which came out of this field was a cloth seal from the 1700’s (Fig.26-27). This one depicted the head of Queen Anne (1702-1707) and on the reverse has a rearing unicorn with the number 3, which was its subsidy value of 3p. I was quite chuffed with this little find as lead times from this period don’t usually fair so well in the ground.

Another first came up in this field which I thought was just a worn out silver sixpence (Fig.28), but curiously I noticed some stamp marks on one side. I decided to post this on a detecting Facebook page and one member came back with the following info. “Originally a William III sixpence, very late 1600’s, then later on re-used in the late 1700’s, early to mid 1800’s. They were counter marked commonly by Irish workers as they are known in the detecting world as “Irish slap tokens”. This is another great aspect of the hobby, which is people are willing to share the their knowledge, you learn something new everyday, eh.

My first treasure case

The slap token was the last find before moving onto the next part of the permission which was literally just over the hedge from this field. This was actually two fields and again I wasn’t going to have long to search them, in actual fact over two weekends I spent two afternoons on them. I will cut to the chase on this part of the permission because most of what came up was scrap pocket fodder, apart from the three lovely items in Fig.29. I’m sure most readers will recognise the broken Edward I penny and the threepence of Elizabeth I, but the third item is new one on me, is it on you?

This pretty little bouquet (Fig.30-31) turned out to be my first treasure case would you believe, and what follows is the summary of the find from the British Museum. “An incomplete Post Medieval silver gilt dress-hook dating c. AD 1500-1600. Read’s Class D, type 6. The dress-hook consists of a trefoil shaped plate with petaled edges and separate soldered transverse attachment loop. The separate soldered wire hook is missing, leaving traces of solder”.

It was pretty cool to have my first treasure case go through, but it did amaze me that this little thing constituted as treasure. I had it in my head that treasure meant vast hoards of gold and silver, not a broken dress hook. Still, a nice little find none the less which all adds to my experiences of being a detectorist.

A deserted medieval village

Now I’m finally getting closer to where I want to be, the site of a deserted medieval village. I will be honest, as much as I did want to detect on this part of the permission I wasn’t too hopeful of finding that much as the village had been extensively excavated by archaeologists the 1970’s. Since then I believe a fair few detectorists have covered the area over the years but to my surprise a few nice things came up. These included a broken part of a medieval zoomorphic vessel handle (Fig.32), a hammered Half penny of King Henry V (Fig.33), a crotal bell which was a ringer (Fig.34) and another zoomorphic end of a medieval pot handle (Fig.35). There was also plenty of general detecting pocket fodder as seen in fig.36.

Meeting new friends

It was also around this time that I met another detectorist called ‘Dal’ out in the field who also had permission on this land. Weirdly we had been following and chatting to each other on instagram for about a year or so not knowing we shared the same permission. Since then we have been out a few times together with varied results. The first time we met was at the end of one of my sessions where I had found a mass of buttons as seen in fig.37, he on the other hand had just found a Roman finger ring, not precious metal and broken but still a bloody good find.

The last time we went out it was my turn to have the find of the day. But before I get to that, I found out that during the excavations of the medieval village in the 1970’s, the archaeologists were a little puzzled that they had bits of Roman and Celtic archaeology turning up here and there. It now transpires that with the help of aerial photography it looks like there was a Roman settlement of some kind in the same field, which probably started life in the late Iron Age. Well, with the next set of finds I would say that’s a strong possibility.

The Romans and the Celts

Finally I was in the field I had been longing to get into, it hadn’t been possible before now because a crop had been in for quite sometime, but now it was coming out. Even better than that the field was being deep ploughed so hopefully new finds were being brought up to the surface! We had a morning on the field before we were told we couldn’t have anymore time as another crop was going straight in, which as you can imagine was incredibly disappointing. But the handful of stuff I did find (Fig.38) in those few hours gave me a glimpse of the history that was potentially there. In that handful of stuff was a beaten up Celtic bronze unit (Fig.39) which had just enough left on it for me to identify. This barnacle encrusted morsel is actually a bronze unit of Cunobelinus which dates 10-40 AD, so the Celts were here, now what about the Romans?

Well, on another trip out on this field we were allowed to go over one corner where the sugar beat crop had been stored. Now the crop had been moved we were free to give that little area the once over. To my surprise just lying on the surface was this belter of a Silver Denarius with the face of Hadrian just starring back at me (Fig40a-40b). The coin dates to 133-135AD, and depicted on the reverse is Salus, the Roman Goddess for wellbeing and safety. It was my eye that caught a flash of silver first but my detector confirmed the fact. But I did wonder why it was just lying on the surface and it now occurs to me that it must have come up with the beats and then fallen off as they were being moved to storage. This quite rightly suggests (I think) that this coin has come from another part of the field, but where?

Roman detail

The detail on this coin as seen in Fig.41 is pretty much in mint condition, which might mean it’s part of a larger collection of coins that were all buried here before they were used. Lol, that’s just me fantasising about finding my first hoard, but who knows, maybe this coin does have a few brothers waiting to be found. At the very least these finds go someway to confirming the origins of a possible Romano-British settlement, which is further supported by Dal finding a Roman disc brooch with some glass decoration and gilt still intact.

Time for a memoir?

It’s going to be while before we can get back into this field but it’s great to know that there is the potential for more finds to be found. It can be frustrating the amount of time us detectorists have to wait to sometimes get into certain fields, but I find it does leave time for other pursuits like writing these articles which is also a great part of the hobby for me. Maybe one day I will be able to write my detecting memoir just like Julian Evan-Hart has done, although mine would probably be better titled as ‘My Detecting Strife’.